Norms of Fairness and Generosity Among People Experiencing Homelessness: A Dictator Game Field Experiment

Abstract

Society often ascribes negative stereotypes to people experiencing homelessness. However, people experiencing homelessness have been found to display highly nuanced social behaviors. We employ a field dictator game to examine prosocial behavior among 173 unhoused individuals in Nashville, TN. We test whether an unhoused population displays ingroup bias, wherein they are more generous toward other people experiencing homelessness (the hypothesized ingroup) than people not experiencing homelessness (the hypothesized out-group). Additionally, we explore relationships between sociodemographic and personal characteristics (social support, perceptions of deservedness/generosity) and dictator game behavior. We did not observe ingroup bias. However, on average, participants allocated 29% of their game endowment to recipients, consistent with cross-cultural dictator game studies. We found that the duration of homelessness, social support, and gender were associated with dictator game allocations. Additionally, people experiencing homelessness were more generous when they perceived other unhoused individuals would be more generous and deserving.

Recommended citation: Anderson, M.C., Hazel, A., Perkins, J., & Almquist, Z. (2024). Norms of Fairness and Generosity Among People Experiencing Homelessness: A Dictator Game Field Experiment. International Journal on Homelessness, 3(3), 1–13.
Download Paper